Recent Carbon Brief articles by tim.dodd

• Climate change is raising the risk of coastal floods in New York City, study finds
• Update: What do the Labour leadership candidates think on climate and energy?
• Keep coal, gas and oil in the ground to save Antarctic ice sheet, study warns
• Guest post: The state of the Greenland ice sheet in 2015
• How storm surges and heavy rainfall drive coastal flood risk in the US
• Scientists: 2015 is a critical year for ‘bold action’ on climate change
• Government can’t take credit for steep 2014 emissions cuts, says Committee on Climate Change
• The Atlantic ‘conveyor belt’ and climate: 10 years of the RAPID project
• In depth: Trust high but progress slow at UN climate talks in Bonn
• G7 leaders target zero-carbon economy
• Factcheck: Is climate change ‘helping Africa’?
• Climate change risks biggest change to marine species in three million years
• What do volcanic eruptions mean for the climate?
• Ambiguous Russian climate pledge mystifies many
• Arctic sea ice hits lowest winter peak on record
• Global emissions trading scheme ‘should be based on UN carbon budget’
• Arctic sea ice decline erratic as expected
• Scientists issue stark warning as Earth passes into ‘danger zone’
• What falling oil prices may mean for the future of renewable energy investment
• Holiday news roundup
• Insights from a global survey of climate change opinion
• Formulating five ways just to thank Ban Ki-moon: Behind the scenes at the Lima climate conference
• Lima week one recap: climate talks falter as governments evade scrutiny
• Two degrees: The history of climate change’s speed limit’
• 2014 on course to be the hottest year on record
• The five massive changes to how we use energy that could limit climate change
• Six years worth of current emissions would blow the carbon budget for 1.5 degrees
• Media round-up: The IPCC synthesis report
• Seven unexpected graphs about the UK’’s energy sector
• Probing the deep: An in-depth look at the oceans, climate change and the hiatus
• Owen Paterson on scrapping the UK’s commitment to reducing emissions
• Factcheck: Daily Express claims windfarms will add £1,000 to household bills
• Owen Paterson’s objections to the Climate Change Act: some context
• Climate change and the extinction of the Aldabran banded snail
• Attributing extreme weather to climate change in real-time
• Around the world in 22 carbon capture projects
• How we can make good decisions about geoengineering
• UK coal power back to historic lows as electricity demand continues to fall
• Behind the scenes at Ban Ki-moon’’s climate summit: The view from New York
• Summaries of country statements given at the UN secretary general’s climate summit
• All the significant announcements from the UN climate summit, and whether they’re new
• Scotland decides: What independence could mean for the country’s climate and energy policies
• Questions and Answers on New Zealand’s “climate change refugees”
• Fracking in the UK – the Carbon Brief summary
• Factcheck: How often do wind turbines catch fire? And does it matter?
• Return to the home of the blizzard: Chris Turney reflects on his recent scientific mission to Antarctica
• Why has the government been criticised for paying ‘too much’ for low carbon energy?
• Southern Europe stands to lose the most from climate change
• Risking it all: Report highlights how climate change threatens US business
• Factchecking claims the IPCC says there will be no dangerous global warming this century
• Obama’’s new coal rule: Bold climate leadership, a lawsuit waiting to happen, or both?
• Carbon Briefing: UK shale oil – what, where, and how much
• Climate change is a political animal
• Germany’’s Energiewende reforms are a step towards giving renewables back to corporations
• IPCC report: Climate change and the things people care about
• The IPCC’s risky talk on climate change
• Calculating damages: How much will climate change cost?
• ‘Climate change poses risks for human and natural systems’: Key quotes from the IPCC’’s Working Group 2 report
• Lunchtime roundup: UK media coverage of the IPCC’s Working Group 2 report
• Thames Barrier’s extraordinary year prompts government to reconsider long term flood plans
• Risk and uncertainty: Calculating the Thames Barrier’s future
• There’s little evidence that climate migration will lead to global conflict
• How much energy did the Young Ones use? Home energy use through the decades
• What the papers say: The EU’’s 2030 target
• The British don’t see cold weather as evidence against climate change, according to new polling
• Linking UK floods and climate change: A discussion notable by its absence?
• Predicting the future: The challenge of regional climate projection
• Climate rhetoric: What’s an energy trilemma?
• AGU 101: A guide to the US’s biggest geoscience conference
• Mail on Sunday’s £300 billion ‘eco bill’ claim is almost double government estimates
• IPCC sea level rise projection probably too low, says expert survey
• Solar Activity and the so-called “Little Ice Age”
• Wet UK summers: melting Arctic sea ice may be partly to blame
• Energy taxes: new polls show why they’re under attack
• Interrogating British Gas’s energy bill rise
• Sunday Telegraph front page marks return to ‘green taxes’ debate
• Why the UK’s politics are incapable of governing energy
• Methane reserves: Does size really matter?
• Boris’s energy policy quick fix will take a decade to kick in
• Energiewende: Electricity bills and Germany’s election
• Ed Davey: New planning regulations don’t allow local veto for wind turbines
• Claims of a global warming pause have had no impact on public opinion
• How much climate change is dangerous? Our poll tries to find out what people think
• Fracking has hardly any public support – but opponents have a tough choice
• Scientists mull slow carbon loss from Arctic permafrost
• Lost in translation: Scientific uncertainty and belief in climate change
• Assessing where to safely store carbon dioxide: It’s all about the rock
• Communicating the risks and uncertainties of climate change at the science and technology committee
• Scientists unveil new and improved El Niño forecasts
• Busting the myths about climate migration
• Climate policy in the Economist: Why ‘wait and see’ doesn’t cut it
• We all agree about communicating climate consensus, don’t we?
• Consensus study: fewer than one per cent of climate studies reject human causes
• Out with the old and in with the new? The rhetoric of new nuclear
• The good life, the green economy and global catastrophe: the changing rhetoric of renewables
• DECC’s climate and energy survey: One poll cooked five ways
• Cloud-building plants help cool the atmosphere (but only slightly)
• Climate scientists highlight urgent need to get to grips with black carbon
• Expert view: what next for the EU ETS?
• New paper shows natural climate cycles can change the pace of atmospheric warming