Scientists discuss how strongly a warming Arctic is implicated in extreme weather
The possibility that a warming Arctic could be influencing extreme weather elsewhere in the world seemed to receive a boost this week. A new paper presented further evidence linking diminishing Arctic sea ice to extreme cold winters elsewhere in the northern hemisphere.
Lead author, Prof Jennifer Francis from Rutgers University, tells us: “Our new results, together with other new studies in this field of research, are adding substantial evidence in support of the connection.”
But not everyone is so sure. We asked a few scientists in the field how strong they consider the evidence linking Arctic sea ice and extreme weather to be. Here’s what they told us.
Arctic amplification
The US, Canada, Japan and UK have all experienced very cold and snowy winters in recent years. In 2012, a paper by Francis and Dr Stephen Vavrus suggested that this extreme weather was a result of rapid warming in the Arctic.
Temperatures in the Arctic are increasing around twice as fast as the global average, a phenomenon known as Arctic amplification. As Arctic sea-ice diminishes, energy from the sun that would have been reflected away by sea-ice is instead absorbed by the ocean.
Francis and Vavrus suggested that warmer Arctic temperatures weaken the jet stream, a fast-flowing river of air high up in the atmosphere. The theory goes that a weaker jet stream becomes ‘wavier’ and leads to more persistent weather conditions, such as long cold spells in winter and heatwaves in summer.
The new paper by the same authors, published this week in Environmental Research Letters, offers further evidence to support the link.
Jet stream waviness
Francis and Vavrus’ work triggered what has become a lively area of research. One of the difficulties with the theory proposed is that it’s very hard to measure the ‘waviness’ of the jet stream directly. Instead, Francis and Vavrus use a number of metrics to measure it in other ways.
One method tries to see the mechanism in action by looking for evidence of temperature differences causing wind patterns to change and the jet stream to get wavier. Another way looks at whether these wavy jet stream patterns are occurring more frequently across the northern hemisphere.
Identifying these patterns of waviness is important because they lead to ‘blocking’, which causes cold weather patterns to hold on for longer. In the 2013-14 US winter, the prolonged spell of very cold weather caused 91 per cent of the Great Lakes to freeze over.
Francis says we’re seeing more of this persistent extreme weather as the Arctic warms up:
“Occurrence of these events has increased during recent decades when Arctic amplification has emerged as a strong signal.”
Arctic amplification is greatest in autumn and winter (see graph below), which is why it mainly results in persistent cold weather events, Francis explains.
Image - Francis & Vavrus (2014) Fig 2a (note)
Timeseries of the Arctic amplification index for each season. A positive index indicates that the Arctic is warming faster than the mid-latitudes. Source: Francis & Vavrus (2015).
Controversial theory
Understanding the effect Arctic amplification could be having in other parts of the world is tricky because it’s a relatively recent phenomenon. Francis and Vavrus define the ‘Arctic amplification era’ as beginning in 1995, which gives scientists less than 20 years’ of data to work with.
As Dr James Screen from Exeter University tells us:
“The changes are only seen over a very short period, so it is impossible to say if they are secular trends or just natural variability.”
Another issue is how you define jet stream ‘waviness’, as Prof Ian Simmonds from the University of Melbourne explains:
“Getting an appropriate definition is important, as conclusions as to whether waviness is increasing or decreasing seem to depend on the metrics being used.”
As a result, not all scientists have been won over by the theory. Francis acknowledges that Arctic warming contributing to a wavier jet stream is the “most controversial aspect of the hypothesis we proposed in our 2012 paper.”
The Arctic may not be to blame
Scientists also haven’t ruled out other factors being involved in the extreme weather, as Screen tells us:
“Correlation and trends doesn’t tell you cause and effect. It is still impossible to pin the blame on the Arctic, so to speak.”
A paper published in October last year, for example, finds that temperature changes in the Atlantic ocean could be triggering warm conditions in the Arctic, and cold weather over Europe and Asia. Simmonds says findings such as these mean there is still doubt regarding the Arctic’s influence:
“Seen in this light, the magnitude of the direct influence of a warm Arctic on mid-latitude extremes becomes more problematic.”
So it seems that scientists are still some way from agreeing on what’s causing these cold winters. As Screen puts it:
“Without evidence of causality or a convincing dynamical mechanism, I would say the evidence still remains suggestive but far from conclusive.”
Pinpointing if and how the Arctic is implicated in extreme weather around the rest of the world is clearly of huge interest, stretching beyond just scientific circles. But teasing out the details is still a very new and active area of research, making this topic one to watch in 2015.